ESRB Explains Why Hatred Is Rated AO
Hatred


The Electronic Software Rating Board, the ESRB, rated Destructive Creations’ Hatred AO, which stands for Adults Only. It received this rating back in January of 2015 but no one knew why… until today.

There was a lot of controversy over why Hatred was rated Adults Only and why there was no proper inclusion of the game’s descriptors on the ESRB’s website if it really was rated AO. Well, the ESRB’s page was updated to finally include Hatred, following the game’s release but it still didn’t explain why the game was rated AO. A rating, I might add, that resulted in the game being banned from being streamed on Twitch.tv.

Some people argued it was because of the game’s theme of going on a shooting spree, while others said it was because of pressure from the controversy drummed up over the media bias that the game has been receiving since its announcement late last year.

After reaching out to the ESRB a few times I did receive a response. According to ESRB communications manager Michelle Pagano, the game was rated AO based on the context of the violence and themes, with Pagano stating…

“Based on the content depicted in Hatred and the overall context of the game, ESRB assigned an AO (Adults Only) rating with content descriptors that include Intense Violence, Blood and Gore, and Strong Language.

 

“Our rating system is designed to ensure that products are evaluated as objectively, reliably and consistently as possible.”

There have been lots of debates about the actual issues of Hatred being rated AO. Some feel as if the game is way too tame in its violence to be labeled as Adults Only, a rating usually reserved for pornographic titles or games with extremely gory violence like Manhunt 2, which included mutilation and dismemberment.

While the content of Hatred’s violence is an interesting subject of debate, the original Postal – and mind you, not the more satirical and tongue-in-cheek Postal 2 – was a straightforward game about a guy snapping and going on a killing spree. It was identical to Hatred insofar that the main character was the antagonist and was killing innocent people and law enforcement personnel with a wide variety of weapons. You could even wound people and execute them as they begged for their life. Here’s one of the final stages in the game… and here’s the description of it, as taken from the Wikipedia page

“The game ends with the Postal Dude attempting to massacre an elementary school, but failing due to having a mental breakdown and ending up getting captured by the government and incarcerated in an asylum.“

 

Postal 1 – Single Player – 17. The Elementary School + Game Ending Film

“10/23/97 The hive has been cleansed. The source of the corruption has been corked, laid in a body bag and dragged to the outskirts of existence…” Game Ending Film – Pictures of the captured Postal dude: Door: https://img651.imageshack.us/img651/5423/fdoor.png Corridor: https://img193.imageshack.us/img193/1950/corridor.png Cell: https://img149.imageshack.us/img149/7546/jacketbg.png Torture: https://img404.imageshack.us/img404/8241/torture2w.png

Postal is rated M for Mature on the ESRB.

Based on the vague descriptions of why Hatred landed the Adults Only rating, it almost seems as if context isn’t the only thing that determine a game’s rating but perhaps graphics play a part in it as well?

What’s even more interesting is that Hatred was rated AO before the game was even properly completed. It begs the question of how much did the ESRB play the game or how informed were they about Hatred to rate the game back in January of 2015 before it was finished? The game didn’t officially release until June 1st, 2015.

Tycho from the Penny Arcade made an acute comment about the Hatred controversy, writing in a post that…

“A big part of the problem on the developer side is that they didn’t flatter games media. What a developer is supposed to do is to give their violence ironic cover, or agree to pretend that it’s a deconstruction of violence, or make the player wear a surreal animal mask, anything to “elevate” the piece so that the press can rub their faces on it like a cat. Barring these, you’d better fucking know one of them.”

Right, because the reality is that Spec Ops: The Line was also Hatred but with a military motif in Dubai. In Call of Duty they get around the issue of “murder simulator” by calling anyone with a gun a “bad guy”. Battlefield gets around the problem in the same way. GTA doesn’t really get around that problem but the added elements of “satire” even when you’re torturing a man to near death allowed Rockstar to escape the AO rating, which fits in with Tycho’s “ironic cover”.

Hotline Miami also manages to escape the same label under the context of a “surreal animal mask”… literally (except for in Australia). And Mortal Kombat X? Well, it doesn’t matter how uncomfortable some of those Fatalities make you, the one below takes place in a fantasy world… so the context makes it a-okay to avoid the AO rating.

YouTube

No Description

Share The Anger


Profile photo of Billy D

About

Billy has been rustling Jimmies for years. The GJP cried and their tears became his milkshake. Contact.

  • Hawk Hopper

    From all the game footage I’ve watched for Hatred, most of it wasn’t particularly gruesome (except for an execution animation or two) but all of the dialogue seems really tongue in cheek. I couldn’t take it seriously, especially the ending.

    I’m honestly surprised the ESRB gave the original Postal an M rating instead of AO. They gave the Playstation One game “Thrill Kill” an AO rating, which caused that game to be cancelled. I wonder if the ESRB would give an updated Postal 1 an AO rating if Running with Scissors improved the graphics for a remake (which I think RWS plans to do.)

    • lucben999

      Thrill Kill had a lot of sexually charged content mixed with the violence, which is what really triggers the ESRB, besides SJW-sponsored media hysteria that is.

  • Nonscpo

    That excuse isn’t good enough!

  • lucben999

    “Our rating system is designed to ensure that products are evaluated as objectively, reliably and consistently as possible.”

    What a fucking farce.

    Their bullshit excuse of “context” is just them admitting that they’re pandering to media hysteria, because the actual CONTENT of the game doesn’t merit the AO rating, and then they have the gall to say their products are evaluated objectively and consistently.

    Fuck the ESRB.

    • Forgot the “http” in the link. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. It’s fixed.

  • Mr0303

    I haven’t visited Penny Arcade for years, but that is a surprisingly good comment from this Tycho fellow. I’m not sure how indoctrinated they are in the SJW narrative. I remember them going with the bandwagon with Dragon’s Crown and I’m pretty sure that at one point they hosted those concern trolls at Extra Credits, who were the ones making the “context matters” argument.

  • Jeremy

    That’s the ESRB for you. Bowing to the filthy social justice warriors and rating it AO to avoid accusations of allowing a game that influenced someone to shoot up a school or police station. Political correctness needs to burn in hell where it belongs.

  • Charles Raisor

    Meanwhile… Fallout 4: Intense Violence, Blood and Gore, Strong Language and Strong use of drugs (says use of drugs… but let’s be honest here, the game not only wants you to use it, there’s addicts everywhere, etc.) M rating. This has more mutilation than hatred and manhunt 2 combined, inconsistent ESRB.

20
Skip to toolbar