#GamerGate: N4G Parent Company Acknowledges Censorship, Hopes For Improvement

HAVAmedia, the parent company of the video game aggregation news site N4G, has responded to the situation regarding censorship, submissions and #GamerGate. Recently there were complaints from the community about a rule that was passed about what type of #GamerGate submissions would be allowed on the site, and it caused an uproar in the community that echoed outside of N4G and into other sub-communities across the internet. Well, the CEO of HAVAmedia finally addressed those concerns after some changes were made at N4G.

Originally, a rule was passed down at N4G that would prevent any news about #GamerGate that wasn’t directly tied to a game from being allowed on the site. This caused a ruckus because #GamerGate is a cultural phenomenon that deals with the corruption in games media and not an actual game. Hence, it would mean that most of the important news about #GamerGate would not be allowed on N4G at all. Gamers considered this as N4G’s way of enacting censorship. The administrator and some of the mod staff saw it as enforcing site policy.

Users rallied together and compiled evidence and information that showed that there were some contradictory policies in play at N4G. The article that contained this information had one of the N4G administrators, Christopher, come in to run damage control and explain why the new policy was put into place. Gamers were unsatisfied with some of his responses.

Eventually a campaign was put together to e-mail and reach out to the HAVAmedia team and request better site-wide policies for submissions and clearer guidelines to prevent some articles from going through while other articles get banned. This rang especially true when some non-game related articles were allowed on N4G but some #GamerGate articles were not.

After the original article went up and a few posts on Reddit were made, as well as spreading the information to Twitter, N4G’s administrator, Christopher, updated the site’s rules on #GamerGate and made some modifications in a blog post.

Following the administrator’s altered stance on allowing certain #GamerGate articles back onto N4G, the HAVAmedia CEO, Vegard Aure, responded to the e-mail campaign from the community standing behind the GamerGate hashtag, saying…

“We have a team in place for operating N4G and we do put our full trust in their ability to make the right dissensions on matters like these. Our team is daily faced with many decisions that will no matter what they choose to do get negative reaction from some members of the community.”

This was also mentioned by the N4G administrator – that some decisions will always carry negative feedback with the community. However, many gamers would agree that educating and informing gamers about corruption happening in the games media ring is a very important topic, especially since it’s been censored at so many other gaming-centric websites around the web, including the main gaming hubs at Reddit.

According to Aure…

“I have not personally been able to follow all the discussion surrounding the problem you are referring to but I understand that there has now been made some changes that seems to address some your concerns so hopefully that will improve the situation surrounding these type of submissions.”

Following the campaign to reach out to HAVAmedia, Christopher retroactively approved one of the articles that were auto-failed before – an article about PC Gamer’s conflict of interest with Ubisoft.

It’s not a perfect situation, and the blog post from the N4G administrator isn’t really a hardline policy stance that can be enforced, but it is an improvement over the loose rules that previously governed submissions related to #GamerGate.

About

OAG staff consists of writers creating content about video game and digital culture.

9 thoughts on “#GamerGate: N4G Parent Company Acknowledges Censorship, Hopes For Improvement

  1. Keep at it William. I noticed for a long time that when ever you submit pro GG articles there that they usually get lost and buried within a few hours but whenever darkride66 submits his anti GG articles they get pushed to the front page almost immediately. It could have only two comments but somehow always makes it to the front page. Do not give up with what you are doing. We need you guys.

  2. I guess those websites are starting to get worried after seeing Joystiq, CVG and others either closing down or dowsizing due to a lack of profitability.

    1. Let the fear fill their hearts and minds, for we feed on their dread and suffering.

      Every one of them that we bring down is another victory against the corruption that plagues our media. Burn them all. Take them one at the time, focus your strikes on points of weakness. Bring the whole thing toppling down on their heads.

      Let them all burn.

    2. Let’s be honest, though: this is damage control 101.

      I imagine the HAVAmedia CEO got an inbox full of e-mails and he yelled a little at the N4G administrators and then they made some modifications to the rule. It’s about equivalent to the CBC National executive producer saying “Uh, yeah… we kind of screwed up and we won’t do it in the future” but it’s a bit hollow.

      I suppose having SOME presence on N4G with GamerGate is better than no presence at all.

  3. “As it stands, GamerGate submissions will be allowed in N4G if it is news regarding content that directly involves a developer, publisher, or similar individual who isn’t a journalist. ”

    Yeah, that’s fine. Even if there are gamers who don’t care about the quality of journalism, they should still care about the quality of the developers especially with how Ubisoft has been making the news a lot for all the wrong reasons,

    1. Let’s be honest here. 99% of GGers are only concerned with pathetic gender wars. I can completely understand N4G’s stance on this, and hope it brings some credibility back to the movement. We’re probably better of just rebranding though, tbh =_=

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Skip to toolbar