2010 FIFA World Cup

Gameplayer triangle

“If a player stops playing – https://tinyurl.com/phbbre5 – it is because he is attracted to another game”.

The part in a game where typically minimum two players are in, they have to fight or compete to win. The part where I see the difference and to make it more exciting is to involve more players, maybe five players, well, as long as there are two players I can explain the first part, circulation. Circulation can never be continuous with only one player, there has to be two, it is like a self-contemplation of spirit as I have read in some of Thomas Troward’s articles, he explains that something always have to be there and in a certain circulation, otherwise nothing could come out. So circulation is important, and that is in every game.

Of course the player has to start rolling the cubes so he or she can make a move then the opponent can have a turn. What a tiny secret of perception is here, is that the player gets his turn to add to the circulation and keep it going. Now some games just have an end but some doesn’t have an end. The player will keep adding to the circulation as long as the interest is there. The player-role is very much-needed, to of course keep the circulation going, but if one or more jumps away, then the game will gradually stop and will be replaced by something. The players choice.

To see the game as the circulation and the player has to be a part of, is actually more remarkable than what first perceived. A game is not a game without the player or the circulation, a game is like the result of a player plus a circulation, that is the value. I am not only talking about a game of chess or monopoly, I am referring to the money-game, the game that makes our civilized society spin. What is your perception of a game, what do you see besides the circulation and the player? Is there anything else besides the two things combined?

Writing of program

I do good in progressing a coaching program as a friend from Bangladesh is helping me out, because he also likes the potential for helping people. We previously had a so-called member on board, or known as the third wheel, but I won’t go in that. What’s important to me is the progress and adaptation of learning others what etc. anxiety is, what to do to overcome it and better yet, what it actually is. The programs him and me are developing won’t be the exact same every time, on the other hand as I learned from when I was in coaching, that new things will emerge when I get studied more and more.

The programs that are being created from my own thinking and at some time it will be mostly about anxiety and the opposite. Where my friend comes in is that he also loves to study it, though he would only assist me and it will be very fine, because it is my vision that I run a sort of interactive, I would go for that a period of time until I get a feedback, but I wouldn’t start with it because, it would disturb the real coaching, as I know people likes to look at things that move, etc. a drama series or a movie.

The writing of it takes a great deal of time. What really matters is the information given and in the right order, so I would have to get to know etc, PowerPoint as a presentation method, and to add, this post is like behind the scenes but, this is to give lights to what coaching is like one on one. To actually coach someone interactive is to make people sit in front of their screen, well, it is their own choice of course to be there, though I bet even though a coach that has the participants to leave the session, never heard of it, but he or she would still sit there to coach, and record it to be smart.

Skip to toolbar